A question that is being asked increasingly is: where can the governments get the money from to 'inject' into the financial markets? There are two possible answers to this question. The first is that they put it onto the national debt, leaving it to be paid back by ourselves and our children through losing a share of the value we create via taxation.
The other is that they simply make it up. This is fraud on an epic scale - but if it is in the national interest why should we worry? I think the answer is that we will still have to pay. Just like the national debt, it is a way of forcing the poor to subsidise the rich. The debt created while the banks were booming may not be real money but it was still used to buy real stuff. So by creating non-existent money and swapping it for worthless assets the government is colluding in this fraudulent creation of value by the rich.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4b94/e4b9421a3acc1298f78a7ec848fcf9879c9c354e" alt=""
As Evan Davies rightly stated on Today this morning, capitalism is a roller-coaster, but one that, rather than choosing to ride, we are born onto. For those who are beginning to grow a little sick and tired might I suggest moving your assets and consumption into the alternative, mutual parts of the economy? Tweet
Hi Molly,
ReplyDeleteGood morning.
Our head continues to spin at the events in the capital markets.
I agree that adding the cost of the bailout to the national debt is an unfair burden that we are placing on future generations. It is particularly onerous because we are doing it without their knowledge or consent. Americans waged a revolution over the issue of taxation without representation.
Free and open access to equity markets are an important component of democratic society. Centralized soviet style approaches to capital allocation decisions lead to economic stasis.
I like your idea of a one year lock-up for equity investments. This encourages investment to create long term shareholder value not speculation for private enrichment.
have a nice weekend.
jimmymac
suppose it is like gambling on the dogs ( i have never) but there is a little bit more to it (fractionally) in that one deliberates if a business is gonna sell some stock and be successful, business does need shareholders to release equity, if not the banks would have even more power and they would screw business over.
ReplyDelete